From jeremystellsmith at gmail.com Sun Nov 4 13:21:12 2007 From: jeremystellsmith at gmail.com (Jeremy Stell-Smith) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:21:12 -0700 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] I just released ccrb 1.2 Message-ID: No time for announcements, can you do that when you get a chance, alexey? Everything else should be done. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-developers/attachments/20071104/3ba0019a/attachment.html From alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com Sun Nov 4 22:24:02 2007 From: alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com (Alexey Verkhovsky) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 20:24:02 -0700 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] I just released ccrb 1.2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3945c4270711041924u1de7ab6fte494022a4fcb5042@mail.gmail.com> > No time for announcements, can you do that when you get a chance, alexey? Woo-hoo! -- Alexey Verkhovsky CruiseControl.rb [http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com] RubyWorks [http://rubyworks.thoughtworks.com] From uwe at datek.no Mon Nov 12 12:20:04 2007 From: uwe at datek.no (donV) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:20:04 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] CCRB-52 support cvs In-Reply-To: References: <1183740053.22049.1.camel@pippin.datek.no> Message-ID: <13622913.post@talk.nabble.com> I submitted a patch to CCRB-52, but there has been no response. Are you still interrested? Uwe Alexey Verkhovsky-3 wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm quite curious to see how you managed it. Some design decisions in > CC.rb should make it... ahem... rather difficult :) > > We will be looking at supporting multiple source control systems (and > probably pluginizing it) some time in the foreseeable future. My current > bias is against supporting CVS (or any other source control system without > atomic commits), because I suspect that it will create too many > restrictions on future development and our target audience (TW Ruby > projects and other early adopter types) don't need it. However, if you > need it, and it can be made into a 3rd party plugin, why not? > > Can you share your code without investing time into spit and polish? > > -- > Alex Verkhovsky > _______________________________________________ > Cruisecontrolrb-developers mailing list > Cruisecontrolrb-developers at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-developers > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CCRB-52-support-cvs-tf4036957.html#a13622913 Sent from the CruiseControl.rb - Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From jeremystellsmith at gmail.com Mon Nov 19 15:25:00 2007 From: jeremystellsmith at gmail.com (Jeremy Stell-Smith) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:25:00 -0800 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] does ccrb want to move to lighthouse, or for that matter, mingle? Message-ID: I'm not a fan of jira, and I noticed rspec just migrated over to mingle, http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645-rspec/overview It's not free, but I suspect either it is for oss apps, or TW wouldn't mind paying a few bucks a month. Then of course, we could also use mingle if it suits our needs, I actually haven't taken a good look at it, but if it worked and was a little less ugly and painful to use, I'd be all for that too. Jeremy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-developers/attachments/20071119/3f3a13da/attachment-0001.html From thewoolleyman at gmail.com Mon Nov 19 22:35:22 2007 From: thewoolleyman at gmail.com (Chad Woolley) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:35:22 -0700 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] does ccrb want to move to lighthouse, or for that matter, mingle? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Nov 19, 2007 1:25 PM, Jeremy Stell-Smith wrote: > Then of course, we could also use mingle if it suits our needs, I actually > haven't taken a good look at it, but if it worked and was a little less ugly > and painful to use, I'd be all for that too. +1 for anything less painfully slow than the current JIRA... From ketanpadegaonkar at gmail.com Mon Nov 19 23:36:36 2007 From: ketanpadegaonkar at gmail.com (Ketan Padegaonkar) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:06:36 +0530 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] does ccrb want to move to lighthouse, or for that matter, mingle? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <47426454.7080008@gmail.com> Chad Woolley wrote: > On Nov 19, 2007 1:25 PM, Jeremy Stell-Smith wrote: >> Then of course, we could also use mingle if it suits our needs, I actually >> haven't taken a good look at it, but if it worked and was a little less ugly >> and painful to use, I'd be all for that too. > > +1 for anything less painfully slow than the current JIRA... -1. Jira allows for anonymous logins. I don't think anonymous logins are available in mingle 1.1. Although I think this is something that may come up in future releases of mingle. -- Ketan Padegaonkar I blog... therefore I am... http://ketan.padegaonkar.name/ If bankers can count, how come they have eight windows and only four tellers? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/cruisecontrolrb-developers/attachments/20071120/6361e0a6/attachment.bin From alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com Tue Nov 20 12:51:43 2007 From: alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com (Alexey Verkhovsky) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:51:43 -0700 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] does ccrb want to move to lighthouse, or for that matter, mingle? In-Reply-To: <3945c4270711191412l406afb80rd4d6617e9ff4bbd8@mail.gmail.com> References: <3945c4270711191412l406afb80rd4d6617e9ff4bbd8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <3945c4270711200951s5470131bgda26d5aa28dab2c8@mail.gmail.com> On Nov 19, 2007 1:25 PM, Jeremy Stell-Smith wrote: > I'm not a fan of jira, and I noticed rspec just migrated over to mingle, > http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645-rspec/overview The biggest improvement to project infrastructure right now would probably be a wiki, for the user-generated documentation. I'm a bit scared by all the link spam administration burdens this would create though. I'm not a fan of JIRA either, but think it is good enough for a [not so very] simple bug tracker. If lighthouse is just a Yet Another Bug Tracker, however many hours it would take to migrate, I know a couple of better ways to spend that time on CC.rb :) If we had something with a wiki and a Subversion browser, on the other hand... Basically, I'm thinking "Trac", or "the much better Trac, aka Mingle". > Then of course, we could also use mingle if it suits our needs Not yet. Reason: it doesn't have a read-only unauthenticated mode of access. Right now we are basically waiting for Mingle to support "public OSS project" scenario. At which point we'll get it right away, for free, including hosting, installation, backups and other sysadmin stuff. If it doesn't happen any time soon, we'll probably swap JIRA for Trac. -- Alexey Verkhovsky CruiseControl.rb [http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com] RubyWorks [http://rubyworks.thoughtworks.com] -- Alexey Verkhovsky CruiseControl.rb [http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com] RubyWorks [http://rubyworks.thoughtworks.com]