From bret at pettichord.com Mon Mar 1 19:47:51 2010 From: bret at pettichord.com (Bret Pettichord) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:47:51 -0600 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] How about we turn off pull requests (Was: [GitHub] gnufied sent you a pull request from gnufied/cruisecontrol.rb) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Another option would be to ask people to post a link to their commit in the ticket. This gives the advantages of using git (way better than patch files) but puts in a place that everyone can see. BTW, this seems to be a general problem with github. I have the same problem with the Watir project. Wondering if maybe we could ask them to give us a better solution. Bret On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Chad Woolley wrote: > How about we turn off pull requests with message asking for > patch+ticket? Since github doesn't allow non-account-owners to view > pull requests, that's the only way to allow all the collaborators to > help manage tickets/patches. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: GitHub > Date: Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:52 PM > Subject: [GitHub] gnufied sent you a pull request from > gnufied/cruisecontrol.rb > To: thewoolleyman at gmail.com > > > > > gnufied wants you to pull from gnufied/cruisecontrol.rb at master > > Body: Can you guys pull in from my fork? I have done two things: > > 1. Do not load smtl_tls.rb for Ruby 1.8.7. > 2. Implement twitter support via plugin. > > There are test cases to cover the functionality as well (and thus > shouldn't be a problem to merge). > > > View repository: http://github.com/gnufied/cruisecontrol.rb/tree/master > _______________________________________________ > Cruisecontrolrb-developers mailing list > Cruisecontrolrb-developers at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-developers > -- Bret Pettichord Lead Developer, Watir, www.watir.com Blog, www.io.com/~wazmo/blog Twitter, www.twitter.com/bpettichord -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thewoolleyman at gmail.com Mon Mar 1 20:17:41 2010 From: thewoolleyman at gmail.com (Chad Woolley) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:17:41 -0700 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] How about we turn off pull requests (Was: [GitHub] gnufied sent you a pull request from gnufied/cruisecontrol.rb) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Bret Pettichord wrote: > Another option would be to ask people to post a link to their commit in the > ticket. This gives the advantages of using git (way better than patch files) > but puts in a place that everyone can see. Why is a pull request better than 'git format-patch'? With format-patch I know exactly what changes they want me to pull; a pull request makes you sort out what changes they actually want to submit (which is hard if they point to master instead of a topic branch, and have continued with unrelated hacks on their master fork). Plus, as I said, there's no way for all the admins to know what is addressed and what isn't with pull requests (and we aren't that good at being responsive anyway, which is the whole reason I brought this up). I'm still strongly in favor of turning off pull requests with a nice descriptive message telling them exactly what to do instead (generate a patch with git format-patch and give them a URL to submit it to the lighthouse project). Also, this is what Rails does, and it seems to work OK for them. Who actually has admin privileges to the thoughtworks github account anyway? I know Jeremy created it, but I don't know the password. -- Chad From thewoolleyman at gmail.com Mon Mar 1 20:20:01 2010 From: thewoolleyman at gmail.com (Chad Woolley) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:20:01 -0700 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] How about we turn off pull requests (Was: [GitHub] gnufied sent you a pull request from gnufied/cruisecontrol.rb) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Bret Pettichord wrote: > Another option would be to ask people to post a link to their commit Just realized I didn't actually address your point. Asking people to include a link to the commit is not good because: 1. People will ignore it 2. changes can span multiple commits git format-patch + ticket solves this plus the other issues I mentioned. From bguthrie at thoughtworks.com Mon Mar 1 22:47:39 2010 From: bguthrie at thoughtworks.com (Brian Guthrie) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 21:47:39 -0600 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] How about we turn off pull requests (Was: [GitHub] gnufied sent you a pull request from gnufied/cruisecontrol.rb) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <646a09521003011947h75c48328x6a9226910b18b0d6@mail.gmail.com> I didn't realize at first why this would be a Good Thing but trying to pull in more recent changes leaves me in agreement that this is a much easier way to handle it - at least you always carry the context with you. I have admin rights and will go ahead and give it a shot. Brian On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Chad Woolley wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Bret Pettichord > wrote: > > Another option would be to ask people to post a link to their commit > > Just realized I didn't actually address your point. Asking people to > include a link to the commit is not good because: > > 1. People will ignore it > 2. changes can span multiple commits > > git format-patch + ticket solves this plus the other issues I mentioned. > _______________________________________________ > Cruisecontrolrb-developers mailing list > Cruisecontrolrb-developers at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-developers > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bret at pettichord.com Tue Mar 2 18:45:11 2010 From: bret at pettichord.com (Bret Pettichord) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 17:45:11 -0600 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-developers] How about we turn off pull requests (Was: [GitHub] gnufied sent you a pull request from gnufied/cruisecontrol.rb) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I didn't know about git format-patch. I will look into using for Watir. Thanks for the explanation. Bret On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Chad Woolley wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Bret Pettichord > wrote: > > Another option would be to ask people to post a link to their commit > > Just realized I didn't actually address your point. Asking people to > include a link to the commit is not good because: > > 1. People will ignore it > 2. changes can span multiple commits > > git format-patch + ticket solves this plus the other issues I mentioned. > _______________________________________________ > Cruisecontrolrb-developers mailing list > Cruisecontrolrb-developers at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-developers > -- Bret Pettichord Lead Developer, Watir, www.watir.com Blog, www.io.com/~wazmo/blog Twitter, www.twitter.com/bpettichord -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: