From tnguyen at bleacherreport.com Tue Jul 8 16:35:31 2008 From: tnguyen at bleacherreport.com (Tung Nguyen) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 13:35:31 -0700 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-users] cruise control always notify of build, regardless of success Message-ID: There a way to configure cruise control to always notify you of a completed build, regardless of whether or not it was success or fail? Thanks, Tung From joe.swatosh at gmail.com Thu Jul 10 00:20:35 2008 From: joe.swatosh at gmail.com (Joe Swatosh) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:20:35 -0700 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-users] 2 Minor issues with 1.3.0 on windows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Joe Swatosh wrote: > Hi all, > > Lest I forget: > > Windows XP Pro SP2 > > C:\CruiseControl\cruisecontrolrb-1.3.0>ruby --version > ruby 1.8.6 (2007-09-24 patchlevel 111) [i386-mswin32] > > > We found two minor problems with CC.rb when trying to run on windows. > > The first effects the Dashboard saying there is no project. In > boot.rb we had to add a .gsub('\\','/') in #find_home when returning > the USERPROFILE. (Unrelated to our problems, but possibly relevant to > some: at line 8 my system would not require the ':' as it is already > part of SYSTEMDRIVE). > > Second, since our USERPROFILE starts C:\Documents and Settings\... the > we need additional quoting in CommandLine#execute around the :stdout > and :stderr options. File.expand_path returns a string with embedded > spaces which would be choked on later. We just wrapped those options > on lines 67 and 68 with quotation marks. > Doh. Darren pointed out to me that my paragraph above isn't very descriptive about exactly which file needs modification. The file is lib/command_line.rb. Our lines 67 and 68 look like: options[:stdout] = "\"#{File.expand_path(options[:stdout])}\"" if options[:stdout] options[:stderr] = "\"#{File.expand_path(options[:stderr])}\"" if options[:stderr] -- Joe From alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com Thu Jul 10 01:21:43 2008 From: alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com (Alexey Verkhovsky) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 23:21:43 -0600 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-users] 2 Minor issues with 1.3.0 on windows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3945c4270807092221h3fcdc5dakca3a51f63d01d4a3@mail.gmail.com> I think we fixed it on the trunk a couple of weeks ago. If you could check and confirm that the problem is gone, it would be much appreciated. -- Alex From joe.swatosh at gmail.com Sat Jul 12 13:41:25 2008 From: joe.swatosh at gmail.com (Joe Swatosh) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:41:25 -0700 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-users] 2 Minor issues with 1.3.0 on windows In-Reply-To: <3945c4270807092221h3fcdc5dakca3a51f63d01d4a3@mail.gmail.com> References: <3945c4270807092221h3fcdc5dakca3a51f63d01d4a3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Alex, On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Alexey Verkhovsky wrote: > I think we fixed it on the trunk a couple of weeks ago. If you could > check and confirm that the problem is gone, it would be much > appreciated. > > -- > Alex I'm sorry I don't have time to do more than browse the repository at the moment, but having done that it looks like both of the issues I raised in this thread have been fixed. Thanks! -- Joe Swatosh From alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com Sat Jul 12 16:06:55 2008 From: alexey.verkhovsky at gmail.com (Alexey Verkhovsky) Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:06:55 -0600 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-users] 2 Minor issues with 1.3.0 on windows In-Reply-To: References: <3945c4270807092221h3fcdc5dakca3a51f63d01d4a3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <3945c4270807121306j56783233re5138242e5fa10cc@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Joe Swatosh wrote: > I'm sorry I don't have time to do more than browse the repository at > the moment, but having done that it looks like both of the issues I > raised in this thread have been fixed. Thank you. -- Alex From dary.merckens at gmail.com Tue Jul 15 01:42:19 2008 From: dary.merckens at gmail.com (Dary) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:42:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-users] Project checks out fine, then I get a PROPFIND request failure when trying to build the project Message-ID: When I add the project everything works. When I run ./cruise build project_name I get "Build loop failed BuilderError: svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/svn/trunk/project_name'". I've noticed a couple people are having this issue, so PLEASE any help is much appreciated. Thanks Dary From averkhov at thoughtworks.com Tue Jul 15 15:22:46 2008 From: averkhov at thoughtworks.com (Alexey Verkhovsky) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-users] Project checks out fine, then I get a PROPFIND request failure when trying to build the project Message-ID: > I get "Build loop failed BuilderError: svn: PROPFIND What happens when you do "svn log" or "svn up" from the command line? -- Alex From thewoolleyman at gmail.com Thu Jul 17 17:11:36 2008 From: thewoolleyman at gmail.com (Chad Woolley) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:11:36 -0700 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-users] Request for examples of ccrb daemon/init script Message-ID: I'd like to improve the sample cruise daemon/init script, and a good first step would be to collect some examples of best practices. If you have one that is working well for you, please paste it in as a comment on this ticket: http://cruisecontrolrb.lighthouseapp.com/projects/9150-cruise-control-rb/tickets/200-better-daemon-init-script Thanks! -- Chad From thewoolleyman at gmail.com Fri Jul 18 22:34:33 2008 From: thewoolleyman at gmail.com (Chad Woolley) Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:34:33 -0700 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-users] Improved daemon/init script (was Re: Request for examples of ccrb daemon/init script) Message-ID: OK, here is my attempt at improving the init script: http://github.com/thewoolleyman/cruisecontrolrb/tree/better-daemon And details of improvements are on the ticket: http://cruisecontrolrb.lighthouseapp.com/projects/9150-cruise-control-rb/tickets/200-better-daemon-init-script Thanks, -- Chad From shingler at gmail.com Tue Jul 22 07:24:53 2008 From: shingler at gmail.com (steven shingler) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:24:53 +0100 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-users] can't execute a build - on windows + jruby Message-ID: Hi all, Am trying to get cc.rb working on a windows machine, running under JRuby. I patched line 19 of project_migration.rb to use jruby, instead of ruby. execute "jruby #{File.join(migrate_scripts_directory, script)} #{@data_dir}" The add project works fine, but when I run start, the webpage just hangs on the ajax request to build - never actually executes the build at all, or comes back with a build failed/passed. There are no error messages in the logs - just a lot of: $ svn --non-interactive log --limit 1 --revision HEAD:1 --verbose --xml using cc.rb 1.3.0 If anyone could give me any pointers, on how to debug, or how to get it to execute builds - I would be very grateful. Many Thanks, Steven From bret at pettichord.com Tue Jul 22 09:25:49 2008 From: bret at pettichord.com (Bret Pettichord) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:25:49 -0500 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-users] can't execute a build - on windows + jruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Looks like you could be running into the same problem that I did, caused by windows (not jruby). My fix was to use trunk instead of 1.3.0. See my blog for more details. Bret On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:24 AM, steven shingler wrote: > Hi all, > > Am trying to get cc.rb working on a windows machine, running under JRuby. > > I patched line 19 of project_migration.rb to use jruby, instead of ruby. > > execute "jruby #{File.join(migrate_scripts_directory, script)} > #{@data_dir}" > > The add project works fine, but when I run start, the webpage just > hangs on the ajax request to build - never actually executes the build > at all, or comes back with a build failed/passed. > > There are no error messages in the logs - just a lot of: > $ svn --non-interactive log --limit 1 --revision HEAD:1 --verbose --xml > > using cc.rb 1.3.0 > > If anyone could give me any pointers, on how to debug, or how to get > it to execute builds - I would be very grateful. > > Many Thanks, > Steven > _______________________________________________ > Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list > Cruisecontrolrb-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users > -- Bret Pettichord CTO, WatirCraft LLC, http://www.watircraft.com Lead Developer, Watir, http://wtr.rubyforge.org Blog (Essays), http://www.io.com/~wazmo/blog MiniBlog (Links), http://feeds.feedburner.com/bretshotlist -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From shingler at gmail.com Tue Jul 22 09:58:59 2008 From: shingler at gmail.com (steven shingler) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:58:59 +0100 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-users] can't execute a build - on windows + jruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: cool - will try - thanks bret On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Bret Pettichord wrote: > Looks like you could be running into the same problem that I did, caused by > windows (not jruby). > > My fix was to use trunk instead of 1.3.0. See my blog for more details. > > Bret > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:24 AM, steven shingler wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Am trying to get cc.rb working on a windows machine, running under JRuby. >> >> I patched line 19 of project_migration.rb to use jruby, instead of ruby. >> >> execute "jruby #{File.join(migrate_scripts_directory, script)} >> #{@data_dir}" >> >> The add project works fine, but when I run start, the webpage just >> hangs on the ajax request to build - never actually executes the build >> at all, or comes back with a build failed/passed. >> >> There are no error messages in the logs - just a lot of: >> $ svn --non-interactive log --limit 1 --revision HEAD:1 --verbose --xml >> >> using cc.rb 1.3.0 >> >> If anyone could give me any pointers, on how to debug, or how to get >> it to execute builds - I would be very grateful. >> >> Many Thanks, >> Steven >> _______________________________________________ >> Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list >> Cruisecontrolrb-users at rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users > > > > -- > Bret Pettichord > CTO, WatirCraft LLC, http://www.watircraft.com > Lead Developer, Watir, http://wtr.rubyforge.org > Blog (Essays), http://www.io.com/~wazmo/blog > MiniBlog (Links), http://feeds.feedburner.com/bretshotlist > _______________________________________________ > Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list > Cruisecontrolrb-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users > > From ben at benburkert.com Wed Jul 23 12:36:34 2008 From: ben at benburkert.com (Ben Burkert) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:36:34 -0500 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-users] github integration Message-ID: <13de14180807230936s11aced67wac050afdbef55481@mail.gmail.com> Hey Folks, I was just wondering if there main ccrb repo was planning on moving to github. I saw something about this mentioned on the developers list, but i haven't seen or heard anything since. Personally, I think moving to github would be a hudge benifit to ccrb. I've seen alot of people forking and commiting patches for my fork of ccrb, and i'm sure the official repo would receive even more community lovin. If it's easier for everyone, i'd would be down for moving my fork with git support via grit to a branch off the official github repo. If so, i'll see if I can get the github guys to delete my fork so that you guys can have the origin. -Ben -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thewoolleyman at gmail.com Wed Jul 23 12:45:45 2008 From: thewoolleyman at gmail.com (Chad Woolley) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:45:45 -0700 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-users] github integration In-Reply-To: <13de14180807230936s11aced67wac050afdbef55481@mail.gmail.com> References: <13de14180807230936s11aced67wac050afdbef55481@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Ben Burkert wrote: > If it's easier for everyone, i'd would be down for moving my fork with git > support via grit to a branch off the official github repo. If so, i'll see > if I can get the github guys to delete my fork so that you guys can have the > origin. I think Alex is favor of this, but just hasn't done it yet. As for deleting your fork, you should be able to do that yourself once ccrb moves for real. Just get your branches locally, then delete your whole project off github, then re-fork off the official ccrb and push your branch back up. I'm sure this is possible, but not so sure of what the commands would be. The github gem is handy for some things: http://errtheblog.com/posts/89-huba-huba -- Chad From ben at benburkert.com Wed Jul 23 13:03:11 2008 From: ben at benburkert.com (Ben Burkert) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:03:11 -0500 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-users] github integration In-Reply-To: References: <13de14180807230936s11aced67wac050afdbef55481@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <13de14180807231003t2ee04f0alf2b6db85b45aa601@mail.gmail.com> So right now with github, you can't delete a branch that's been forked, unless the forked ones are deleted first. I'd rather not try to coordinate getting 20 or so people each deleting their branch at the same time, that's why I mentioned getting the github guys to delete it. The point I was trying to make is that i think my fork is important enough and used by enough people to be a branch off origin. I know you guys are working hard on getting ccrb running the git stuff without relying on grit, but as of now, the grit version works most anyone not running windows, which i suspect is most people who use ccrb with git anyways. Until the grit-less ccrb is working with git on all platforms, I think it would be a win-win for everyone if the grit branch was part of the official repository. I don't have a problem maintianing a seperate fork, and i could honestly care less about getting a commit bit to ccrb, I just feel that making this move would help alot of rails developers move to git, which is better for everyone. -Ben On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Chad Woolley wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Ben Burkert wrote: > > If it's easier for everyone, i'd would be down for moving my fork with > git > > support via grit to a branch off the official github repo. If so, i'll > see > > if I can get the github guys to delete my fork so that you guys can have > the > > origin. > > I think Alex is favor of this, but just hasn't done it yet. As for > deleting your fork, you should be able to do that yourself once ccrb > moves for real. Just get your branches locally, then delete your > whole project off github, then re-fork off the official ccrb and push > your branch back up. I'm sure this is possible, but not so sure of > what the commands would be. The github gem is handy for some things: > http://errtheblog.com/posts/89-huba-huba > > -- Chad > _______________________________________________ > Cruisecontrolrb-users mailing list > Cruisecontrolrb-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/cruisecontrolrb-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From thewoolleyman at gmail.com Wed Jul 23 13:59:53 2008 From: thewoolleyman at gmail.com (Chad Woolley) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:59:53 -0700 Subject: [Cruisecontrolrb-users] github integration In-Reply-To: <13de14180807231003t2ee04f0alf2b6db85b45aa601@mail.gmail.com> References: <13de14180807230936s11aced67wac050afdbef55481@mail.gmail.com> <13de14180807231003t2ee04f0alf2b6db85b45aa601@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I see your point now. This is really about the Grit support :) I agree. Having tried the git support in the rubyforge origin (is that the right term?) just last weekend, it is obviously not working well, and I opened several tickets against it. I know Alex doesn't want to have external dependencies, but until someone has the time to fix it right (which isn't me), the grit alternative should be supported. The only thing I'm not sure of is how much harder it is for you do maintain your branch updated if ccrb still remains on rubyforge for now. A lot harder? A little harder? It seems like, with the nature of git, it should not be a huge deal, but I don't understand the details of branching and merging enough to know myself. -- Chad On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Ben Burkert wrote: > The point I was trying to make is that i think my fork is important enough > and used by enough people to be a branch off origin. I know you guys are > working hard on getting ccrb running the git stuff without relying on grit, > but as of now, the grit version works most anyone not running windows, which > i suspect is most people who use ccrb with git anyways. Until the grit-less > ccrb is working with git on all platforms, I think it would be a win-win for > everyone if the grit branch was part of the official repository. I don't > have a problem maintianing a seperate fork, and i could honestly care less > about getting a commit bit to ccrb, I just feel that making this move would > help alot of rails developers move to git, which is better for everyone.