[libxml-devel] libxsl

[Trans]

On Nov 26, 2007 11:33 AM, Dan Janowski <danj at 3skel.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:02, Sean Chittenden wrote:

> The packages should be separate, but since xsl may or may not be
> available, it seemed like an easier build config to manage if the two
> are separated, with different extconf.rb files. Since they build
> different .so objects, the directory partition reflects the library
> output.

Okay. I misunderstood then. I thought we wanted to move to a single
package. If it's two packages, then it is better to keep them in
separate projects or subprojects. Do you want to go the subproject
route then (versus the separate projects we have now)?

> > Regardless of anything I've said in the past, they should definitely
> > be two different modules that get required independently.
> >
> libxslt should, without doubt, internally require 'libxml' and raise
> a LoadError (i think) if it cannot, since all document objects are
> dependent on libxml.

Yep.

T.