[libxml-devel] package name: libxml-ruby -> libxml ?

[Dan Janowski]

Never liked it much myself.

Dan


On Feb 1, 2008, at 16:29, Trans wrote:

> I think we may want to change the package name from 'libxml-ruby' to
> just 'libxml'. The reason I suggest this is b/c, while it might
> suffice as is, it's confusing in light of platform gems. Ie. the "-
> ruby" looks like a platform specification. I know other gems use the  
> "-
> ruby" suffix to indicate a pure ruby version of an otherwise compiled
> library.
>
> Thoughts?
> T.
> _______________________________________________
> libxml-devel mailing list
> libxml-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel