[libxml-devel] package name: libxml-ruby -> libxml ?

[Charlie Savage]

rlibxml?

Charlie

Dan Janowski wrote:
> Never liked it much myself.
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> On Feb 1, 2008, at 16:29, Trans wrote:
> 
>> I think we may want to change the package name from 'libxml-ruby' to
>> just 'libxml'. The reason I suggest this is b/c, while it might
>> suffice as is, it's confusing in light of platform gems. Ie. the "-
>> ruby" looks like a platform specification. I know other gems use the  
>> "-
>> ruby" suffix to indicate a pure ruby version of an otherwise compiled
>> library.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>> T.
>> _______________________________________________
>> libxml-devel mailing list
>> libxml-devel at rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> libxml-devel mailing list
> libxml-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3237 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/libxml-devel/attachments/20080201/2c272bad/attachment.bin