[libxml-devel] Libxml directory structure

[Sean Chittenden]

> Quite so, that's what I meant by including LibXML at the toplevel
> actually. I fully understand your need and wanting a convenient
> require that does so. I trust, require 'xml', which will now do just
> that, will work for you?


It will, I'm just concerned about breaking code and think:

require 'libxml'

Should "do the right thing" and guess as best it can (ObjectSpace,  
etc), while

require 'xml'

will be explicit.  -sc

--
Sean Chittenden
sean at chittenden.org