returning(...) ?

[Stephen Caudill]

On Sep 5, 2007, at 3:36 AM, Brian Candler wrote:

> This gives users of Merb three options:
> - don't use core extensions
> - use Merb's core extensions plugin
> - use someone else's core extensions (e.g. ActiveSupport), which  
> may be
>   necessary in the case where an ORM depends on it (e.g. ActiveRecord)
>
> Comments?

Bah.. got trigger happy with the send button.  Just to complete my  
thought:

I'm not opposed to that library living in an insular namespace for  
internal use so it wouldn't collide with ActiveSupport or Facets.   
But when it gets down to brass tacks, as a developer of merb, I'd  
still like to have our own internal lib of methods I can rely on to  
behave in a certain manner.

--

Stephen Caudill (voxdolo)