[Rspec-devel] should_be_nil or should.be.nil
David Chelimsky
dchelimsky at gmail.com
Tue Jun 6 20:05:07 EDT 2006
On 6/6/06, Lachie <lachiec at gmail.com> wrote:
> The dots made me look twice at rSpec in the first place, but it was
> more because it was such a novel approach.
>
> in the end
> +1 Underscore
>
Bear in mind that the initial syntax was underscores. The dots were
introduced later in order to make the implementation simpler and more
robust. So from an implementation standpoint, I'd prefer to only
support dots. From a usability standpoint, I'd like to use
underscores. So, since I live on both sides of that divide:
+. 5 Dots
+ .5 Underscores
More information about the Rspec-devel
mailing list