[Rspec-devel] should_be_nil or should.be.nil

[Cuong Tran]

I'm just a rspec beginner but I would vote for DOT since it's a bit easier
on my finger :-)
My little finger is overwork already.

On 6/6/06, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/6/06, Lachie <lachiec at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The dots made me look twice at rSpec in the first place, but it was
> > more because it was such a novel approach.
> >
> > in the end
> > +1 Underscore
> >
>
> Bear in mind that the initial syntax was underscores. The dots were
> introduced later in order to make the implementation simpler and more
> robust. So from an implementation standpoint, I'd prefer to only
> support dots. From a usability standpoint, I'd like to use
> underscores. So, since I live on both sides of that divide:
>
> +. 5 Dots
> + .5 Underscores
> _______________________________________________
> Rspec-devel mailing list
> Rspec-devel at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-devel/attachments/20060606/7f45a8ca/attachment.htm