On 9/9/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Priit Tamboom</b> <<a href="mailto:priit.tamboom@eesti.ee">priit.tamboom@eesti.ee</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I wonder does anybody planning to go beyond the default html formatter/report?<br></blockquote></div><br>Two things on that subject came up today, during some RSpec work. It would be nice if:<br><ol><li>The report contained pending messages, when specified,
e.g.:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">describe "Secure passwords with MD5" do</blockquote><div><br><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">
pending "Waiting on selection of an MD5 library."</blockquote><div><br><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote">end <br>
</blockquote></div>The HTML report contains 'Secure passwords with MD5' as pending, but does not add the explanation as to why.<br></div></li><li>It would be nice to be able to use DHTML expansion to see the source of the spec, sometimes; when we're doing walkthroughs with the customer representative, it's useful for him to be able to see the source as well as the descriptions.
</li></ol> - Geoffrey<br>-- <br>Geoffrey Wiseman<br>