[Rubyforchange-talk] Let's Find a Project

[Tony Devlin]

I agree with Chad and Evan, an extremely permissive Open Source license
would be my deal clincher.

With that being said, I am not sure what Open Source license out there would
be better suited for us.



On 8/16/07, Evan David Light <evan at tiggerpalace.com> wrote:
>
> That would be my going in position as well.  This allows us to
> potentially benefit other organizations long term other than the one
> that we target for assistance.
>
> On Aug 16, 2007, at 11:38 AM, Chad Fowler wrote:
>
> > On 8/16/07, Helder Ribeiro <helder at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Just a small question: are we talking about free software here?
> >>
> >> I mean, that sounds like an obvious "yes" to me, but I don't know
> >> people's backgrounds on this list or how strongly they feel one
> >> way or
> >> the other.
> >>
> >
> > My vote would be for software to be licensed under an extremely
> > permissive Open Source license.
> >
> > Chad
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rubyforchange-talk mailing list
> > Rubyforchange-talk at rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubyforchange-talk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rubyforchange-talk mailing list
> Rubyforchange-talk at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubyforchange-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rubyforchange-talk/attachments/20070816/45c2ca98/attachment-0001.html