[grammarians] ambiguity with method call?

[MenTaLguY]

On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 17:19 +0000, yawl.20481481 at bloglines.com wrote:
> I have solved a similar issue(see http://seclib.blogspot.com/2005/11/more-on-leftshift-and-heredoc.html
> ) and the same rules apply in this case.

Interesting.  In the heredoc case, you've basically got to distinguish
between unary and binary uses of <<.

Do you have a partial ANTLR grammar together, out of curiosity?

I'd be interested to see what you and Ter each have at this point.

-mental
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rubygrammar-grammarians/attachments/20051201/da1a6efd/attachment.bin