From mental at rydia.net Wed Nov 1 13:38:04 2006 From: mental at rydia.net (MenTaLguY) Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:38:04 -0500 Subject: [grammarians] rubygrammar-commits Message-ID: <1162406284.11525.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Oh, a quick heads' up -- the rubygrammar-commits mailing list should be working now. Would anyone object if I also shunted the commit messages here, or do you think the lists should be separate? -mental -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 191 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rubygrammar-grammarians/attachments/20061101/c3b05b3f/attachment.bin From olle at olleolleolle.dk Wed Nov 1 15:13:14 2006 From: olle at olleolleolle.dk (Olle Jonsson) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 21:13:14 +0100 Subject: [grammarians] rubygrammar-commits In-Reply-To: <1162406284.11525.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1162406284.11525.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <81F1D71D-8D66-4F2A-A1E1-FBF5306B9231@olleolleolle.dk> On November 1, 2006, at 19:38 , MenTaLguY wrote: > Would anyone object if I also shunted the commit messages here, or do > you think the lists should be separate? +1 interested! That is: Shunt 'em over here! (We'll complain loudly when it gets be too much. And, we're all adults who know how to filter our list emails.) Looking forward to commits, Olle From mtrier at gmail.com Wed Nov 1 16:28:33 2006 From: mtrier at gmail.com (Michael Trier) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:28:33 -0500 Subject: [grammarians] rubygrammar-commits In-Reply-To: <1162406284.11525.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1162406284.11525.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <3b2d977c0611011328l44bb7009q8655fceee3026b2b@mail.gmail.com> > Oh, a quick heads' up -- the rubygrammar-commits mailing list should be > working now. > > Would anyone object if I also shunted the commit messages here, or do > you think the lists should be separate? I'm in favor of it. Michael From charles.nutter at sun.com Wed Nov 1 16:47:54 2006 From: charles.nutter at sun.com (Charles Oliver Nutter) Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 15:47:54 -0600 Subject: [grammarians] rubygrammar-commits In-Reply-To: <1162406284.11525.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1162406284.11525.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <4549160A.2090209@sun.com> MenTaLguY wrote: > Oh, a quick heads' up -- the rubygrammar-commits mailing list should be > working now. > > Would anyone object if I also shunted the commit messages here, or do > you think the lists should be separate? I don't imagine they'll be high-traffic, but keep them separate anyway. -- Charles Oliver Nutter, JRuby Core Developer Blogging on Ruby and Java @ headius.blogspot.com Help spec out Ruby today! @ www.headius.com/rubyspec headius at headius.com -- charles.nutter at sun.com From mental at rydia.net Wed Nov 1 18:36:24 2006 From: mental at rydia.net (MenTaLguY) Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:36:24 -0500 Subject: [grammarians] rubygrammar-commits In-Reply-To: <3b2d977c0611011328l44bb7009q8655fceee3026b2b@mail.gmail.com> References: <1162406284.11525.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <3b2d977c0611011328l44bb7009q8655fceee3026b2b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1162424184.13331.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 16:28 -0500, Michael Trier wrote: > > Would anyone object if I also shunted the commit messages here, or do > > you think the lists should be separate? > > I'm in favor of it. So, you're in favor of publishing commit messages on grammarians, or in favor of reserving them for the separate mailing list? -mental -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 191 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rubygrammar-grammarians/attachments/20061101/dd12ebe0/attachment.bin From mtrier at gmail.com Wed Nov 1 20:08:43 2006 From: mtrier at gmail.com (Michael Trier) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 20:08:43 -0500 Subject: [grammarians] rubygrammar-commits In-Reply-To: <1162424184.13331.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1162406284.11525.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <3b2d977c0611011328l44bb7009q8655fceee3026b2b@mail.gmail.com> <1162424184.13331.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <3b2d977c0611011708o1925c6a6rffbf18fb73eeb292@mail.gmail.com> > > > Would anyone object if I also shunted the commit messages here, or do > > > you think the lists should be separate? > > > > I'm in favor of it. > > So, you're in favor of publishing commit messages on grammarians, or in > favor of reserving them for the separate mailing list? Sorry should have been more clear. I'm in favor of posting the commit messages here on the grammarians list. Michael From charles.nutter at sun.com Wed Nov 1 23:01:29 2006 From: charles.nutter at sun.com (Charles Oliver Nutter) Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 22:01:29 -0600 Subject: [grammarians] rubygrammar-commits In-Reply-To: <3b2d977c0611011708o1925c6a6rffbf18fb73eeb292@mail.gmail.com> References: <1162406284.11525.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <3b2d977c0611011328l44bb7009q8655fceee3026b2b@mail.gmail.com> <1162424184.13331.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <3b2d977c0611011708o1925c6a6rffbf18fb73eeb292@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <45496D99.70904@sun.com> Michael Trier wrote: > > Sorry should have been more clear. I'm in favor of posting the commit > messages here on the grammarians list. Seems like most want it that way, so go ahead with it. I don't imagine it's going to flood us in traffic. -- Charles Oliver Nutter, JRuby Core Developer Blogging on Ruby and Java @ headius.blogspot.com Help spec out Ruby today! @ www.headius.com/rubyspec headius at headius.com -- charles.nutter at sun.com