[Vit-discuss] Redesign 2005 Blog

[Curt Hibbs]

James Britt wrote:
>
> I much prefer Michael's "Clean" 1.0 .  It's, well, *cleaner*, crisp,
> more modern; the header wastes less space,  logo is not the routine,
> semi-realistic Ruby gem.  The Clean logo scales well,  and lends itself
> better to T-shirts, business cards, and other re-use.

This is my take as well, unless its possible to create alternate versions of
the other logo that were simplified and more stylized (as I said in a
previous post).

> (On a side note, I can see possible problems with encouraging discussion
> here, and on ruby-talk, and as well as in blog comments.  There are
> likely to be duplicate discussions, with people missing good points
> unless they are actively following all sources.)

I would not encourage any discussion on ruby-talk... that's why we create
this ML.

Curt