From zeljko.filipin at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 00:27:58 2012 From: zeljko.filipin at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?=C5=BDeljko_Filipin?=) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:27:58 -0600 Subject: [Wtr-development] watir-webdriver 0.5.2 Message-ID: More information at http://watir.com/2012/02/01/watir-webdriver-0-5-2/ ?eljko -- watir.com/book - author -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jarmo.p at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 01:11:17 2012 From: jarmo.p at gmail.com (Jarmo) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 08:11:17 +0200 Subject: [Wtr-development] watir-webdriver 0.5.2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I guess you have a typo there - "Watir::Select#selected_options no longer returns Array, but Array". J. On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:27 AM, ?eljko Filipin wrote: > More information at http://watir.com/2012/02/01/watir-webdriver-0-5-2/ > > ?eljko > -- > watir.com/book - author > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-development mailing list > Wtr-development at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From alister.scott at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 06:00:17 2012 From: alister.scott at gmail.com (Alister Scott) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 03:00:17 -0800 (PST) Subject: [Wtr-development] watir-webdriver 0.5.2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <13094572.1937.1328094017032.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfq33> I have created a new page on watirwebdriver.com about the new cookies API. Thanks Jari for implementing so quickly. http://watirwebdriver.com/cookies/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From alex.ikhelis at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 09:32:03 2012 From: alex.ikhelis at gmail.com (Aliaksandr Ikhelis) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:32:03 +0000 Subject: [Wtr-development] watir-webdriver 0.5.2 In-Reply-To: <13094572.1937.1328094017032.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfq33> References: <13094572.1937.1328094017032.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfq33> Message-ID: Great job, thank you, Jari! Jarmo - any specific plans when final watir3.0 will be released? Also, wonder is there any consideration for matching Watir Cookies API to watirspec as well? Thank you, Aliaksandr Ikhelis On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Alister Scott wrote: > I have created a new page on watirwebdriver.com about the new cookies > API. Thanks Jari for implementing so quickly. > > http://watirwebdriver.com/cookies/ > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-development mailing list > Wtr-development at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jari.bakken at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 09:48:04 2012 From: jari.bakken at gmail.com (Jari Bakken) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:48:04 +0100 Subject: [Wtr-development] watir-webdriver 0.5.2 In-Reply-To: References: <13094572.1937.1328094017032.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfq33> Message-ID: On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Aliaksandr Ikhelis wrote: > > Also, wonder is there any consideration for matching Watir Cookies API to > watirspec as well? > > Looks like Jarmo plans to implement it, yes: https://github.com/watir/watir-webdriver/issues/24 Jari -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jarmo.p at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 10:08:45 2012 From: jarmo.p at gmail.com (Jarmo) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 17:08:45 +0200 Subject: [Wtr-development] watir-webdriver 0.5.2 In-Reply-To: References: <13094572.1937.1328094017032.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfq33> Message-ID: Yes, someone will probably implement Cookies API, but i'm afraid it won't be in 3.0 final, rather in some next version, otherwise the release won't happen. Release will happen when Hugh will make specs pass for IE9 too. Jarmo On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Jari Bakken wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Aliaksandr Ikhelis > wrote: > >> >> Also, wonder is there any consideration for matching Watir Cookies API to >> watirspec as well? >> >> > Looks like Jarmo plans to implement it, yes: > > https://github.com/watir/watir-webdriver/issues/24 > > Jari > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-development mailing list > Wtr-development at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From colinsdaddy at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 17:01:16 2012 From: colinsdaddy at gmail.com (Hugh McGowan) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:01:16 -0600 Subject: [Wtr-development] Watir 3.0 pre-announcement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, I've pushed changes for IE9 into watirspec and watir. This was great actually, because watirspec found a few bugs in IE9 that our previous tests didn't catch. I'm now getting the same test failures for IE8 and IE9 so they are at least working consistently. The only feature I had to punt on was using execute_script in a frame. Normal browser works but for the frame IE9 no longer supports #wrapper_obj. Wasn't able to figure it out on a first look so it's out of compliance for now along with the file_fields (but we knew about that). Jarmo, can you sync up and run the watirspec tests to make sure you're seeing the same failures I am? I ran in both versions of the browser but wanted to make sure there's nothing I'm missing and you're seeing the same results. Thanks! Hugh IE8 and IE9 failures: https://gist.github.com/1623398 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jari.bakken at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 17:53:46 2012 From: jari.bakken at gmail.com (Jari Bakken) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 23:53:46 +0100 Subject: [Wtr-development] Watir 3.0 pre-announcement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Hugh, I've made a few comments on the watirspec changes: https://github.com/watir/watirspec/commit/dc331f9a862f70c006c6030209b9e627470461e9 On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Hugh McGowan wrote: > Hi all, > > I've pushed changes for IE9 into watirspec and watir. This was great > actually, because watirspec found a few bugs in IE9 that our previous tests > didn't catch. I'm now getting the same test failures for IE8 and IE9 so > they are at least working consistently. > > The only feature I had to punt on was using execute_script in a frame. > Normal browser works but for the frame IE9 no longer supports #wrapper_obj. > Wasn't able to figure it out on a first look so it's out of compliance for > now along with the file_fields (but we knew about that). > > Jarmo, can you sync up and run the watirspec tests to make sure you're > seeing the same failures I am? I ran in both versions of the browser but > wanted to make sure there's nothing I'm missing and you're seeing the same > results. > > Thanks! > Hugh > > IE8 and IE9 failures: > https://gist.github.com/1623398 > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-development mailing list > Wtr-development at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From colinsdaddy at gmail.com Wed Feb 1 18:38:41 2012 From: colinsdaddy at gmail.com (Hugh McGowan) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 17:38:41 -0600 Subject: [Wtr-development] Watir 3.0 pre-announcement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Got it - makes sense and I'll make a fix to correct that. Thanks for pointing that out. Hugh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jarmo.p at gmail.com Thu Feb 2 04:24:20 2012 From: jarmo.p at gmail.com (Jarmo) Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:24:20 +0200 Subject: [Wtr-development] Watir 3.0 pre-announcement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Added also one comment here: https://github.com/watir/watir/commit/44eba025f3dfb1c046461d9d46785a29656e27f7 Otherwise than that i'm seeing same failures as i did before when not taking new cookies api into account. Jarmo On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Hugh McGowan wrote: > Got it - makes sense and I'll make a fix to correct that. Thanks for > pointing that out. > > Hugh > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-development mailing list > Wtr-development at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From colinsdaddy at gmail.com Thu Feb 2 12:25:28 2012 From: colinsdaddy at gmail.com (Hugh McGowan) Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:25:28 -0600 Subject: [Wtr-development] Watir 3.0 pre-announcement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I made those changes in addition to a few Jari recommended. Thanks! Hugh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From colinsdaddy at gmail.com Thu Feb 2 12:36:41 2012 From: colinsdaddy at gmail.com (Hugh McGowan) Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:36:41 -0600 Subject: [Wtr-development] watirspec and IE8/IE9 Message-ID: Hi Jari, I made the changes you recommended but I think there's still a dangling issue. In a few cases I had to do different deviations for :ie8 and :ie9. This is fine and they seem to work well, but these tests won't get run on implementation.rb files that just specify :ie (meaning they handle :ie but they don't have :ie8 or :ie9 handled). Is that OK or should we look to add functionality to run something if it's not in a group (so something like devates_on :ie9 and deviates_on_all_but :ie9). Not sure how else these tests are used and I don't want to silently skip tests that might catch issues. I'm happy to code the implementation for that if it's something we want to do. Thanks! Hugh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jari.bakken at gmail.com Fri Feb 3 04:15:51 2012 From: jari.bakken at gmail.com (Jari Bakken) Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:15:51 +0100 Subject: [Wtr-development] watirspec and IE8/IE9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Hugh McGowan wrote: > Hi Jari, > > I made the changes you recommended but I think there's still a dangling > issue. In a few cases I had to do different deviations for :ie8 and :ie9. > This is fine and they seem to work well, but these tests won't get run on > implementation.rb files that just specify :ie (meaning they handle :ie but > they don't have :ie8 or :ie9 handled). > > deviates_on is meant to have a corresponding not_compliant_on block, essentially duplicating the original spec with a "deviation" - a small change that describes the behaviour of the deviating implementation. If you only add deviates_on, then those blocks are only run for the guarded implementation. Or did I misunderstand? If so, please give some code examples of the problem. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gfrank at chathamfinancial.com Fri Feb 3 14:33:35 2012 From: gfrank at chathamfinancial.com (George Frank) Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Wtr-development] Permission request to use the Watir logo on a poster Message-ID: <744389F0727C2A4D854BF4CB048D64EE01AEDD713335@btsmxp02.chathamfinancial.com> Hi, I'm a software developer at Chatham Financial, a respected, worldwide company in the financial derivatives market. Thanks for contributing to Watir! Our QA team is a big fan of it! (We're migrating some of our tests to it.) I'm contacting you because we would like to publicly display a logo for Watir on a poster at recruiting events. I believe the logo is released under the BSD license along with the code, but I wasn't sure so I'm asking. The idea is that we want to showcase at a glance some of the software/programs that we work with every day - hence displaying the logos instead just listing the names of software/programs. As a primarily financial company, this is one way we're trying to show prospective developers and QA that we use current technologies and aren't stuck back in the age of mainframes. The immediate use case would be at Villanova University's Spring Career Fair, but we would want to use it when we attend career fairs at other locations as well. The poster will have other logos for other products we use, and will be on the scale of about 3'x4'. At the bottom, we will also include a disclaimer that the logos are the respective companies' trademarks, that either permission to show the logos was explicitly obtained, or is permitted in accordance with licensing surrounding the logo, and that we had no involvement with the creation of each product or logo. So far, we have been granted permission by everyone we've asked (RhinoMocks, Ninject, Memcached, to name a few), and we're hoping we'll get all 23 that we'd like. Let me know what you think. Thanks! George ______________________________________________ George Frank Chatham Financial 235 Whitehorse Lane Kennett Square, PA 19348 T: 484.731.0017 F: 610.925.3125 www.ChathamFinancial.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bret at pettichord.com Fri Feb 3 20:12:01 2012 From: bret at pettichord.com (Bret Pettichord) Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 19:12:01 -0600 Subject: [Wtr-development] Permission request to use the Watir logo on a poster In-Reply-To: <744389F0727C2A4D854BF4CB048D64EE01AEDD713335@btsmxp02.chathamfinancial.com> References: <744389F0727C2A4D854BF4CB048D64EE01AEDD713335@btsmxp02.chathamfinancial.com> Message-ID: Yes this will be fine. On Feb 3, 2012 2:13 PM, "George Frank" wrote: > Hi,**** > > I'm a software developer at Chatham Financial, a respected, worldwide > company in the financial derivatives market.**** > > ** ** > > Thanks for contributing to Watir! Our QA team is a big fan of it!**** > > (We?re migrating some of our tests to it.)**** > > ** ** > > *I'm contacting you because we would like to publicly display a logo for > Watir on a poster at recruiting events.* > > *I believe the logo is released under the BSD license along with the > code, but I wasn?t sure so I?m asking. * > > ** ** > > The idea is that we want to showcase *at a glance* some of the > software/programs that we work with every day - hence displaying the logos > instead just listing the names of software/programs. As a primarily > financial company, this is one way we?re trying to show prospective > developers and QA that we use current technologies and aren?t stuck back in > the age of mainframes.**** > > ** ** > > The immediate use case would be at Villanova University?s Spring Career > Fair, but we would want to use it when we attend career fairs at other > locations as well.**** > > ** ** > > The poster will have other logos for other products we use, and will be on > the scale of about 3'x4'.**** > > At the bottom, we will also include a disclaimer that the logos are the > respective companies' trademarks, that either permission to show the logos > was explicitly obtained, or is permitted in accordance with licensing > surrounding the logo, and that we had no involvement with the creation of > each product or logo.**** > > ** ** > > So far, we have been granted permission by everyone we?ve asked > (RhinoMocks, Ninject, Memcached, to name a few), and we?re hoping we?ll get > all 23 that we?d like.**** > > ** ** > > Let me know what you think.**** > > Thanks!**** > > George**** > > ** ** > > ______________________________________________ > *George Frank** > *Chatham Financial** > > 235 Whitehorse Lane > Kennett Square, PA 19348 > T: 484.731.0017**** > > F: 610.925.3125**** > > www.ChathamFinancial.com**** > > ** ** > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-development mailing list > Wtr-development at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jarmo.p at gmail.com Sat Feb 4 04:43:22 2012 From: jarmo.p at gmail.com (Jarmo) Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 11:43:22 +0200 Subject: [Wtr-development] Watir 3.0.rc2 Released! Message-ID: Hello everyone! I'm happy to announce that another version of Watir has been just released - 3.0.rc2. Its biggest goal is to conform even better with WatirSpec making it more compliant with Watir-WebDriver. Changelog: * Browser#textarea(s) method for searching