[Yarv-devel] making OOPSLA05 Poster

[SASADA Koichi]

Hi,

Thanks.
I reflected your comments.

Shashank Date wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> SASADA Koichi wrote:
> 
> 
>>http://www.atdot.net/~ko1/tmp/OOPSLA05_poster.pdf
>>(now, optimization is empty)
>>
> 
> 
> I have not followed all the changes suggested by others, so these may be
> a repetitions.
> 
> On Page 2:
> 
> 1. In "Project Objective", the statement reads:
> 
> To solve this problem, several virtual _machines has_ been developed,
> but none has achieved adequate performance...
> 
> It should be:
> 
> To solve this problem, several virtual _machines have_ been developed,
> but none has achieved adequate performance...
> 
> 2. In "Optimization of VM Speedup", under the bullet point: Operands,
> Instructions Unification (a.k.a. Super Instruction),
> the point is:
> 
> Create new instructions which are embedded specific operands or combined
> some instructions.
> 
> It is not clear to me what you want to say about the new instructions.
> But by looking at the context, my guess is:
> 
> Create new instructions which embed specific operands or combine some
> instructions.
> 
> 3. Down below under "Evaluation", the statement reads:
> 
> Right two graphs show results of YARV speedup ratio compared to current
> Ruby interpreter.
> 
> I would put it as:
> 
> The two graphs on the right show results of YARV speedup ratio compared
> to current Ruby interpreter.
> 
> 4. In the same box on the left, under "Status and Future work", the
> Issues list:
> 
> Native Thread support and run Ruby program parallel
> 
> It should be:
> 
> Native Thread support and run Ruby programs in parallel
> 
> 5. Under the Issues list again:
> 
> AOT (Ahead-of-Time) Compilation completely
> 
> It should be just:
> 
> AOT (Ahead-of-Time) Compilation
> 
> Or:
> 
> Complete AOT (Ahead-of-Time) Compilation
> 
> 6. Finally,
> 
> Apply other optimizations using example from Smalltalk, Self and other
> dynamic OO languages.
> 
> Should be:
> 
> Apply other optimizations using examples from Smalltalk, Self and other
> dynamic OO languages.
> 
> The word example should be plural. Unless, of course, there is only one
> example. :-)
> 
> Hope this helps .... wish you the very best at RubyConf 05 and OOPSLA'05.



> Please consider writting for "Ruby Code and Style", the online Enlgish
> zine we launched today (10/10/2005).
> 

Congratulation for your web-zine startup.
Sure :)  And we can collaborate about Rubyist Magazine and Ruby-CS


> Thanks,
> -- Shashank




Regards,
-- 
SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net